Skip to content

Evidence-first profile surface

Ask the work, not just the résumé.

This site is built so people can inspect what I am building now, what shaped it, and the ideas underneath CueCrux instead of relying on a compressed profile.

Myles Bryning

Cambridge, UK

Myles Bryning

Founder and Operator In Trust at CueCrux. Engineering discipline, AI systems, automation, and public thinking about answers that need to survive contact with reality.

Signal

Grounded in About, Now, Writing, Books, and White papers

Signal

Built for collaborators and serious readers

Signal

Evidence first. Summary second.

Grounded lookup

About · Now · Writing · Books · White papers

Ask about the work

Use the site like an inspection surface. Ask what I am building now, what shaped it, or where to start if you want the full thesis rather than the compressed version.

The lookup only uses local site material. If server-side LLM synthesis is enabled, it rewrites the same grounded material instead of inventing a separate profile.

Suggested prompts

Start with a direct question like “What is Myles building now?” or “What did he do before CueCrux?” and the site will answer from its own material.

Signal over summary

The site is designed as an inspection surface, not a compressed profile. It gives people a way to investigate the work instead of inferring from a static résumé.

Now and then

Questions can pull from current focus, older engineering context, and the bridge between them so visitors can see what changed and what stayed consistent.

Grounded answers

Responses are assembled from authored pages, essays, books, and white papers first. The optional LLM layer only rewrites what the local material already supports.

Why this surface exists

AI has made static professional profiles less trustworthy and more interchangeable. When every summary is polished and every application channel is saturated, the stronger move is to make the work inspectable.

Instead of asking people to trust a compressed story, this site lets them investigate the actual material: what I am building, how I think, where the ideas came from, and what I am focused on right now.

What changes when people can investigate

A grounded interface changes the encounter. Visitors move from filtering mode into investigation mode because the site can answer direct questions and point back to the underlying pages.

That matters more in a zero-trust environment where fluent summaries are cheap. The goal here is to show depth, operating style, and proof surfaces before any conversation has to fill in the gaps.

Now

Building CueCrux under real-world pressure

Most of the current work is about operational discipline: how answers behave once people rely on them, automate them, and scale them.

  • CueCrux MVP, evidence surfaces, and release discipline
  • Uncertainty signalling, confidence drift, and failure modes
  • Founder responsibilities: governance, funding paths, and early partnerships
Open the /now page

Then

Engineering, design automation, and verification discipline

Before CueCrux, Myles worked across SolidWorks, DriveWorks, PDM, website design, and stress testing — where assumptions had to survive contact with physics, data integrity, and real failure modes.

  • SolidWorks, DriveWorks, and PDM: design automation, data management, and version control for physical systems
  • Stress testing and verification: the instinct that confidence without proof is a liability
  • Website design and software integration: the bridge into systems thinking and automation at scale
Read the background

Latest writing

Short notes, essays, and longer reflections on AI, trust, evidence, and the systems I’m building and questioning.

27 March 2026

The Metric No One Is Measuring

AI agents are benchmarked on reasoning, code generation, and task completion. But nobody measures whether they can maintain effective context across a real work session. We built a scoring framework to find out, and the test itself proved the point.